Public health is not a very new
subject. The history of Cholera epidemic and study led by John Snow and
subsequent action of sanitary reforms dated in nineteenth century provide insight into evolution of modern Public health. Nevertheless, definition, area of Public
Health remained vague for a long time.
We used to have discussions on
definitions, scope and boundaries of Public health in Classes. I remember we
agreed that Public Health is broad. Some even said, “the scope of Public Health
ranges from beneath the land to the sky. There is no limit in the zone of
Public health.” We concluded that everyone who are working to improve the
health of people are Public health professionals. We weren’t completely wrong
though. Indeed, if you are working for the welfare of people, that's absolutely
public health action. But in my today’s understanding, it contravenes against
the essence of Public Health.
Why do we need demarcation?
Before I clarify why it contravenes
the principle of public health, I would like to focus why it is necessary to
demarcate the scope and to define Public Health professionals.
Professional growth of Public
health: Once
you are certain that which land is yours, then you will be better able to
design the city there. People will design the buildings, roads, other
infrastructures, and invest money to expand the area. In similar fashion, Once
the scope and area of Public Health is demarcated, it will be a lot easier to
decide on what to invest, where to invest. At least the government will not be baffled
whether to build a Hospital or Public health outlet providing education to a
target group when government allocates funds on the title of Public Health.
Solidarity: only the wolfs form the pack, fishes
make the school and animals make horde and similar people make the community.
They can set a goal, solidify and work to reach that goal provided that they
have resources. Such Unions will help to strengthen the communal feelings and
they work for their advancements. This will help in leaving impact to the
society.
Working Environment: This demarcation will help in
ensuring the capacity and limitation of the public health professionals.
Who are Public Health Professionals?
Institute of Medicine defines Public Health
Professionals, “a person educated in public health or a related discipline who
is employed to improve health through a population focus”. Scutchfield and Keck
in Principles of Public Health Practice restate that “The test for whether something should be considered part of public
health is the presence of a focus on a population group or community and on a
preventive strategy or a preventable outcome.” There are two key things
that public health focuses an action of
prevention and approach as
population group or the community. The action of prevention ranges from
primordial prevention to tertiary level of Prevention and this should be
targeted to the Population health. To define a public health professionals and
public health practice, these two factors should always be taken into
consideration.
Because of vague definition of Public health
professionals, it has become really difficult to enumerate Public health
workers and It is a global issue. Physician, Nurses, veterinarian, engineers,
administrators, anyone can be public health workers. However, the two key
elements should be taken into consideration. It is essential to devise workforce
taxonomy in Public health because of its current undefined nature. Public
health occupations can broadly be divided into four main categories: 1. management
and leadership, 2. professionals and scientific, 3. technical and 4. outreach
and support services. Theses public health professionals should have
professional competencies to carry out certain essential public health services
such as monitoring health status, diagnosing and investigating health problems
and health hazards in the community, informing, educating and empowering people
about health issues, mobilizing community partnerships to identify and solve
health problems, developing policies and plans that support individual and
community health efforts, enforcing laws and regulations, Research.
It is necessary to reevaluate definition of Public health workforce for professional growth, unity and benchmark.
References:
F. Douglas Scutchfield and C. William Keck. Principles of Public Health Practice. 2009.
TRIPS and other agreements by WTO has followed the supremacy of the market. Castro when asked about Cuba having improved its public health indicators, replied it is so because we are not part of WTO. We need to incorporate an understanding about neoliberal discourse, the odious debt, the volcker shock, rise of euro dollars or petro dollars. Also a kenyesian approach as envusaged in the Washinton consensus needs to be revived
ReplyDelete